The worktree approch for parallel agents makes so much sense. I've been switcing branches manually and it gets messy when working on multiple featres at once. Curious how well this holds up with merge conflicts tho, does each worktree handle its own conflict resolution or do you have to deal with them centrally?
Git worktrees don't auto-resolve merge conflicts. They help in parallel feature developments, or bug fixes without continuous switching of branches.
Whenever merge conflicts happen, we deal with them the normal git way. Or ask the agent (Cursor/Claude Code) to resolve the conflict. Or use IDE's merge editor to handle it visually.
The worktree approch for parallel agents makes so much sense. I've been switcing branches manually and it gets messy when working on multiple featres at once. Curious how well this holds up with merge conflicts tho, does each worktree handle its own conflict resolution or do you have to deal with them centrally?
Git worktrees don't auto-resolve merge conflicts. They help in parallel feature developments, or bug fixes without continuous switching of branches.
Whenever merge conflicts happen, we deal with them the normal git way. Or ask the agent (Cursor/Claude Code) to resolve the conflict. Or use IDE's merge editor to handle it visually.
Hope that helps!